[Yum] Survey of Use

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 10:35:49AM -0400, seth vidal alleged:
> > I've got yum repos for those who know what's good for them... The 
> > university IT dept uses the current server I run to patch its RHL 
> > machines.  Scares me, to be honest!
> 
> Well with the new up2date supporting yum and apt repository types it's
> not terribly necessary anymore.
> 
> 
> > $2500 USD for RH Proxy server (basically an up2date server, bleeccch)
> > $25/installation of Workstation when in quantities over 100
> > $150/installation of RHES
> > $1500/installation of RHAS
> 
> eek $25/workstation? What about beowulf nodes - do they count as
> workstations?

So let me get this straight...

I can either go with fedora and upgrade all machines every year, or I
can go with enterprise and pay through the roof every year?  Hrm, tough
choice.

Like probably many others, I'm trying to decide right now what to do
with my RH7.x machines.  Fedora or enterprise?  Hrm.

I'll have 1000+ machines within a few months.  Hrm.  Let's see.
$2500   = 1 * $2500 Proxy server
$19125  = 765 * $25 i386 WS (compute nodes)
$384000 = 256 * $1500 opteron AS (compute nodes)
$288000 = 192 * $1500 itanium AS (compute nodes)
$4500   = 3 * $1500 i386 AS (head nodes)
Totals: $698125

Ouch.  That's obviously not going to happen.  The opteron/itanium BS
pisses me off.  I'm looking at the enterprise 3 mirror right now, there
are 2 added packages in opteron that are not in i386.  A $1475
difference for two packages!

Anyone know if fedora will ever build for other arches besides i386?


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Legacy List]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux