On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 12:55:50PM -0500, seth vidal alleged: > > > FWIW, I've been talking a little with seth. One bad bug is squished > > (x86_64 would never be detected as the active architecture), and a > > little workaround makes sure it can install i386 packages as well. > > > > Still to solve is packages existing in both package sets (i386 and > > x86_64) sometimes with a partially overlapping set of files. > > Solving this one is on my short list. > > I may ask you to test some changes to the arch handling in the > not-so-distant future. I'm playing with an x86_64 box right now, and just fell into the same problem. Can I get the work-around? -- Garrick Staples, Linux/HPCC Administrator University of Southern California -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.dulug.duke.edu/pipermail/yum/attachments/20031111/bf803f22/attachment.bin
