> FWIW, I've been talking a little with seth. One bad bug is squished > (x86_64 would never be detected as the active architecture), and a > little workaround makes sure it can install i386 packages as well. > > Still to solve is packages existing in both package sets (i386 and > x86_64) sometimes with a partially overlapping set of files. Solving this one is on my short list. I may ask you to test some changes to the arch handling in the not-so-distant future. -sv
