--=-wdSRtiP86KcQzS+xEw7z Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2002-09-25 at 17:11, Jack Neely wrote: > On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 03:27:45PM -0400, seth vidal wrote: > >=20 > > > >=20 > > >=20 > > > It reports back 'i686'. If I do a update bproc-modules it wants to > > > install i686. Checked the package in the tree and the i686 arch is > > > there and seems sane. > > >=20 > >=20 > > ok I'm using my test machine and I'm not liking what I'm finding. > >=20 > > I'm not getting athlon suggestions, but I'm not getting suggestions tha= t > > seem consistent. > >=20 > > I'm trying to sort it out now. > >=20 > > just to be clear - the pkg beowulf should pull in those other packages = - > > are there any obsoletes among those pkgs? > >=20 > > -sv > >=20 >=20 > Yes there are obsoletes among the other packages. The stuff that is > obsoleted is not versioned nor should any of it be installed. You can > get at the stuff at ftp://rk-devel.pams.ncsu.edu/ncsubeo >=20 so I found another bestarch bug in the depresolve - but I've also found some sort of bug in those packages. bproc-modules requires kernel =3D 2.4.19-ncsubeo.0 kernel-beoboot provides kernel =3D 2.4.19 but it appears that rpm is perfect happy that an install of bproc-modules and kernel-beoboot completely satisfy all deps. I did it manually and via yum. rpm -Va --nofiles --nomd5 says the rpmdb is dep-correct. so there is a package problem and you have ferreted out a bizarro-world bug. I'll put up another snapshot shortly. thanks -sv --=-wdSRtiP86KcQzS+xEw7z Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQA9kihF1Aj3x2mIbMcRApsSAJ9liIVxPPF2HnAIMyQmkd+r9wrVoQCfaBpb pFWfNwPXWHVanvezXc3T+4U= =a54U -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-wdSRtiP86KcQzS+xEw7z--
