[Yum] arch bug

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 09:44:44AM -0400, seth vidal wrote:
> fo/yum
> > 
> > Seth,
> > 
> > This didn't strike me as the same bug when I first ran into it.  The
> > error message is (I think) complaining about that yum is trying to
> > install the wrong arch.  I've got i386, i686, and athlon packages.  Of
> > course, they must match the kernel arch because they are kernel modules.
> > 
> > I'll try your latest snapshot.
> 
> 
> Please do and do a -d5 - I'd like to see what its pulling.

        http://anduril.pams.ncsu.edu/~slack/yum2.log

that's me doing a yum -d 10 install beowulf with today's snapshot where
beowulf is an empty package that runs some %post magic and depends on
all the beowulf packages including bporc-nodules.  It still wants to
install the athlon arch.

> 
> The thing is an athlon package _should_ run on an i686 - or at least it
> should install.

Should *install*, yes, run no.  At least, not kernel modules built with
althon symbols.

> 
> try specifically updating that package:
> 
> yum -d 5 update bproc-modules would be the most useful thing.

And, of course, this installs the right arch, i686 and proper deps that
bproc-modules uses.

What I'm trying to do here is make an easy, automated way to get all the
packages to make a RK box into a beowulf head node.  Hence the "beowulf"
package.

> 
> -sv
> 

Jack Neely

-- 
Jack Neely <slack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Linux Realm Kit Administration and Development 
PAMS Computer Operations at NC State University
GPG Fingerprint: 1917 5AC1 E828 9337 7AA4  EA6B 213B 765F 3B6A 5B89


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Legacy List]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux