[Crash-utility] Re: Revert "arm64: section_size_bits compatible with macro definitions"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Guanyou,

On Tue, Oct 8, 2024 at 10:30 PM Guanyou Chen <chenguanyou9338@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi tao, lianbo
>
> Will it be merged before version 8.0.6 ?

Yes, I'm handling it, will be merged shortly.

Thanks,
Tao Liu

>
> Guanyou Chen <chenguanyou9338@xxxxxxxxx> 于2024年9月20日周五 14:54写道:
>>
>> Thanks for the feedback!
>>
>> Tao Liu <ltao@xxxxxxxxxx> 于2024年9月11日周三 11:02写道:
>>>
>>> Hi lianbo,
>>>
>>> On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 2:32 PM lijiang <lijiang@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > On Mon, Sep 9, 2024 at 2:16 PM Tao Liu <ltao@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> Hi Guanyou & lianbo,
>>> >>
>>> >> I re-thought about the patch, and I agree the revert patch should be
>>> >> applied, the reverted code is already covered by the previous:
>>> >>
>>> >> if (THIS_KERNEL_VERSION >= LINUX(5,12,0)) {
>>> >> ...
>>> >> else
>>> >> ...
>>> >>
>>> >> hunk, so there is no need for the
>>> >> CONFIG_ARM64_4K_PAGES/CONFIG_ARM64_16K_PAGES checks here. Previously
>>> >> the patch was applied for the compatibility of android kernel due to
>>> >> its customization, mainline kernel won't need this.
>>> >>
>>> >> What do you think? @Lianbo Jiang
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Sorry for the late reply, Tao and Guanyou.
>>> >
>>> > I agree with you, let's revert this one(because that patch seems not needed.)
>>> >
>>> Agreed, let's go with the revert.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Tao Liu
>>>
>>> > Thanks
>>> > Lianbo
>>>
--
Crash-utility mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://${domain_name}/admin/lists/devel.lists.crash-utility.osci.io/
Contribution Guidelines: https://github.com/crash-utility/crash/wiki




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]

 

Powered by Linux