Hi lianbo,
On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 2:32 PM lijiang <lijiang@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 9, 2024 at 2:16 PM Tao Liu <ltao@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Guanyou & lianbo,
>>
>> I re-thought about the patch, and I agree the revert patch should be
>> applied, the reverted code is already covered by the previous:
>>
>> if (THIS_KERNEL_VERSION >= LINUX(5,12,0)) {
>> ...
>> else
>> ...
>>
>> hunk, so there is no need for the
>> CONFIG_ARM64_4K_PAGES/CONFIG_ARM64_16K_PAGES checks here. Previously
>> the patch was applied for the compatibility of android kernel due to
>> its customization, mainline kernel won't need this.
>>
>> What do you think? @Lianbo Jiang
>
>
> Sorry for the late reply, Tao and Guanyou.
>
> I agree with you, let's revert this one(because that patch seems not needed.)
>
Agreed, let's go with the revert.
Thanks,
Tao Liu
> Thanks
> Lianbo
--
Crash-utility mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://${domain_name}/admin/lists/devel.lists.crash-utility.osci.io/
Contribution Guidelines: https://github.com/crash-utility/crash/wiki
