在 2022/8/1 上午11:06, Yixun Lan 写道:
Hi Xianting
On Mon, Aug 1, 2022 at 2:36 AM Xianting Tian
<xianting.tian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
在 2022/8/1 上午10:09, Yixun Lan 写道:
HI Xianting：
On Sat, Jul 30, 2022 at 8:56 AM Xianting Tian
<xianting.tian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
在 2022/7/30 上午7:29, Yixun Lan 写道:
HI Xianting
On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 3:11 PM Xianting Tian
<xianting.tian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
在 2022/7/29 下午9:44, Yixun Lan 写道:
Hi Xianting
On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 2:55 AM Xianting Tian
<xianting.tian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
This series of patches are for Crash-utility tool, it make crash tool support
RISCV64 arch and the common commands(*, bt, p, rd, mod, log, set, struct, task,
dis and so on).
To make the crash tool work normally for RISCV64 arch, we need a Linux kernel
patch(under reviewing), which exports the kernel virtual memory layout, va_bits,
phys_ram_base to vmcoreinfo, it can simplify the development of crash tool.
The Linux kernel patches:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20220717101323.370245-1-xianting.tian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
This series of patches are tested on QEMU RISCV64 env and SoC platform of
T-head Xuantie 910 CPU.
====================================
Some test examples list as below
====================================
... ...
KERNEL: vmlinux
DUMPFILE: vmcore
CPUS: 1
DATE: Fri Jul 15 10:24:25 CST 2022
UPTIME: 00:00:33
LOAD AVERAGE: 0.05, 0.01, 0.00
TASKS: 41
NODENAME: buildroot
RELEASE: 5.18.9
VERSION: #30 SMP Fri Jul 15 09:47:03 CST 2022
MACHINE: riscv64 (unknown Mhz)
MEMORY: 1 GB
PANIC: "Kernel panic - not syncing: sysrq triggered crash"
PID: 113
COMMAND: "sh"
TASK: ff60000002269600 [THREAD_INFO: ff60000002269600]
CPU: 0
STATE: TASK_RUNNING (PANIC)
carsh>
crash> p mem_map
mem_map = $1 = (struct page *) 0xff6000003effbf00
crash> p /x *(struct page *) 0xff6000003effbf00
$5 = {
flags = 0x1000,
{
{
{
lru = {
next = 0xff6000003effbf08,
prev = 0xff6000003effbf08
},
{
__filler = 0xff6000003effbf08,
mlock_count = 0x3effbf08
}
},
mapping = 0x0,
index = 0x0,
private = 0x0
},
... ...
crash> mod
MODULE NAME BASE SIZE OBJECT FILE
ffffffff0113e740 nvme_core ffffffff01133000 98304 (not loaded) [CONFIG_KALLSYMS]
ffffffff011542c0 nvme ffffffff0114c000 61440 (not loaded) [CONFIG_KALLSYMS]
crash> rd ffffffff0113e740 8
ffffffff0113e740: 0000000000000000 ffffffff810874f8 .........t......
ffffffff0113e750: ffffffff011542c8 726f635f656d766e .B......nvme_cor
ffffffff0113e760: 0000000000000065 0000000000000000 e...............
ffffffff0113e770: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 ................
crash> vtop ffffffff0113e740
VIRTUAL PHYSICAL
ffffffff0113e740 8254d740
PGD: ffffffff810e9ff8 => 2ffff001
P4D: 0000000000000000 => 000000002fffec01
PUD: 00005605c2957470 => 0000000020949801
PMD: 00007fff7f1750c0 => 0000000020947401
PTE: 0 => 209534e7
PAGE: 000000008254d000
PTE PHYSICAL FLAGS
209534e7 8254d000 (PRESENT|READ|WRITE|GLOBAL|ACCESSED|DIRTY)
PAGE PHYSICAL MAPPING INDEX CNT FLAGS
ff6000003f0777d8 8254d000 0 0 1 0
crash> bt
PID: 113 TASK: ff6000000226c200 CPU: 0 COMMAND: "sh"
#0 [ff20000010333b90] riscv_crash_save_regs at ffffffff800078f8
#1 [ff20000010333cf0] panic at ffffffff806578c6
#2 [ff20000010333d50] sysrq_reset_seq_param_set at ffffffff8038c03c
#3 [ff20000010333da0] __handle_sysrq at ffffffff8038c604
#4 [ff20000010333e00] write_sysrq_trigger at ffffffff8038cae4
#5 [ff20000010333e20] proc_reg_write at ffffffff801b7ee8
#6 [ff20000010333e40] vfs_write at ffffffff80152bb2
#7 [ff20000010333e80] ksys_write at ffffffff80152eda
#8 [ff20000010333ed0] sys_write at ffffffff80152f52
Xianting Tian (8):
Add RISCV64 framework code support
RISCV64: Make crash tool enter command line and support some commands
RISCV64: Add 'dis' command support
RISCV64: Add 'irq' command support
RISCV64: Add 'bt' command support
RISCV64: Add 'help -r' command support
RISCV64: Add 'mach' command support
RISCV64: Add the implementation of symbol verify
Makefile | 7 +-
README | 2 +-
configure.c | 39 +-
defs.h | 248 +++++++-
diskdump.c | 21 +-
help.c | 2 +-
lkcd_vmdump_v2_v3.h | 2 +-
netdump.c | 22 +-
ramdump.c | 2 +
riscv64.c | 1414 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
symbols.c | 10 +
11 files changed, 1759 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 riscv64.c
--
2.17.1
I'm actually having problem with these patch set, got a compiling error:
=== error log ===
riscv64-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc -c -g -DRISCV64 -DGDB_10_2 -O2 -pipe
lkcd_common.c
riscv64-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc -c -g -DRISCV64 -DGDB_10_2 -O2 -pipe
lkcd_v1.c -DMCLX
riscv64-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc -c -g -DRISCV64 -DGDB_10_2 -O2 -pipe
lkcd_v2_v3.c -DMCLX
In file included from lkcd_v1.c:21:
lkcd_vmdump_v1.h:121:30: error: field ‘dh_regs’ has incomplete type
121 | struct pt_regs dh_regs;
| ^~~~~~~
make[5]: *** [Makefile:385: lkcd_v1.o] Error 1
make[5]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
In file included from lkcd_v2_v3.c:21:
lkcd_vmdump_v2_v3.h:90:30: error: field ‘dha_regs’ has incomplete type
90 | struct pt_regs dha_regs;
| ^~~~~~~~
make[5]: *** [Makefile:388: lkcd_v2_v3.o] Error 1
make[4]: *** [Makefile:1871: gdb] Error 2
make[3]: *** [Makefile:10072: all-gdb] Error 2
make[2]: *** [Makefile:860: all] Error 2
crash build failed
It's strange, actually I didn't meet such compiling error by 'make
target=RISCV64', the compiling is OK.
Do you have more details for the build?
FYI, I'm using source code of crash, commit: f37df7df8a50
I don't think it's necessary to pass 'target' variable explicitly, see
the comment of Makefile
==== snip of Makefile
# target could be set on command line when invoking make. Like: make target=ARM
# otherwise target will be the same as the host
ifneq ($(target),)
CONF_TARGET_FLAG="-t$(target)"
endif
====
besides, it actually recognized the correct target successfully
==== snip of build log
make -j8 CC=riscv64-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc
AR=riscv64-unknown-linux-gnu-ar 'CFLAGS=-O2 -pipe' 'LDFLAGS=-Wl,-O1
-Wl,--as-needed'
TARGET: RISCV64
CRASH: 8.0.1++
GDB: 10.2
====
Sorry, I don't quite understand, we usually build crash tool on x86_64
for analyzing other ARCH's vmcore.
As README shows, we need type target=XXX for analyzing XXX arch vmcore.
If we only use 'make' to build on X86_64, it is used to analyze x86_64's
vmcore.
I don't think "make -j8 CC=riscv64-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc" is ok for the
build. If I am wrong, please correct me. thanks
the difference is :
I'm here using native compiling approach for crash utility, which mean
the host OS distro is also a riscv64 (lp64d) Linux.
# uname -a
Linux unmatch 5.18.15-gentoo-riscv64 #1 SMP Sat Jul 30 20:12:16 CST
2022 riscv64 GNU/Linux
this should also work as expected which already proved by arm64/ppc/etc..
Thanks, seems not all ARCHs support such build.
Anyway, I will add your fix as a separate patch to be included by my
patch set, and add "Co-developed-by: Yixun Lan <yixun.lan@xxxxxxxxx>"
hey, I think it's not quite an independent patch, so I'm totally fine
with it folding into other patches,
and since it's trivial, I don't mind dropping the "Co-developed-by" tag,
instead if you like, you can add my "Tested-by" tag
It is OK, V2 patch set has sent, you can check it.
thanks
Yixun
--
Crash-utility mailing list
Crash-utility@xxxxxxxxxx
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility
Contribution Guidelines: https://github.com/crash-utility/crash/wiki
