On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 10:44:10AM -0500, Dave Anderson wrote: > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 3:46 PM, Dave Anderson <anderson@xxxxxxxxxx> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > >> Hi, > > >> > > >> For x86, crash avoids storing any '__crc_*' symbols. It should do the > > >> same for ARM, right? Credit goes to Rabin Vincent for this patch, > > >> unless you don't like it, in which case you can blame me. > > > > > > I suppose. It was more of a clutter-reducer than anything else in > > > the case of x86. But I do note that the __crc_ symbols come after > > > "_end" in one of the sample ARM dumpfiles I've got on hand. > > > > > > > Clutter reduction is the reason for both of these patches as well and > > even if the __crc_'s are ignored we'll still get _end+<offset> > > printouts for everything in the range [_end, 0xff0a81a8]. Of course, a > > patch for PRRR shouldn't break 'mod -s'. Here's an alternative patch. > > > > /Per > > OK good -- I'll queue both the __crc_ and PRRR/NMRR patches for crash-6.1.3, > pending any (unlikely) disapprovals/NAKs from Mika or Jan. Sorry for being late. Both patches look good to me. -- Crash-utility mailing list Crash-utility@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility
