On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 4:44 PM, Dave Anderson <anderson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > ----- Original Message ----- >> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 3:46 PM, Dave Anderson <anderson@xxxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >> > >> > >> > ----- Original Message ----- >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> For x86, crash avoids storing any '__crc_*' symbols. It should do the >> >> same for ARM, right? Credit goes to Rabin Vincent for this patch, >> >> unless you don't like it, in which case you can blame me. >> > >> > I suppose. It was more of a clutter-reducer than anything else in >> > the case of x86. But I do note that the __crc_ symbols come after >> > "_end" in one of the sample ARM dumpfiles I've got on hand. >> > >> >> Clutter reduction is the reason for both of these patches as well and >> even if the __crc_'s are ignored we'll still get _end+<offset> >> printouts for everything in the range [_end, 0xff0a81a8]. Of course, a >> patch for PRRR shouldn't break 'mod -s'. Here's an alternative patch. >> >> /Per > > OK good -- I'll queue both the __crc_ and PRRR/NMRR patches for crash-6.1.3, > pending any (unlikely) disapprovals/NAKs from Mika or Jan. > Naturally. Thanks. /Per > Thanks, > Dave > >> >> > Anyway, I don't have a problem with the patch. Mika? >> > >> > Dave >> > >> > -- >> > Crash-utility mailing list >> > Crash-utility@xxxxxxxxxx >> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility >> >> -- >> Crash-utility mailing list >> Crash-utility@xxxxxxxxxx >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility > > -- > Crash-utility mailing list > Crash-utility@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility -- Crash-utility mailing list Crash-utility@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility
