Re: [RFC] ASoC: use inclusive language for SND_SOC_DAIFMT_CBx_CFx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Hi Mark

> > We should not use (A) today, use (B) instead, but we still have (A)
> > definition for backword compatibility.
> > I think we should full switch to use (B), and remove (A).
> 
> > But it will be too big-patch-set. To avoid patch-bomb, I will post
> > some of them as sample. I will post full-patch-set if there was no
> > objection.
> 
> Yes, we should do the conversion - I've been chipping away at this
> intermittently myself (mainly for CODECs).  If you want to push through
> the remainder that'd be awesome!

Thank for the feedback.
I will wait 1 or 2 weeks to get other feedback, and will post the patch-set

Thank you for your help !!

Best regards
---
Kuninori Morimoto




[Index of Archives]     [Pulseaudio]     [Linux Audio Users]     [ALSA Devel]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux