Re: [RFC] ASoC: use inclusive language for SND_SOC_DAIFMT_CBx_CFx

[Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, Feb 19, 2025 at 01:18:51AM +0000, Kuninori Morimoto wrote:

> We should not use (A) today, use (B) instead, but we still have (A)
> definition for backword compatibility.
> I think we should full switch to use (B), and remove (A).

> But it will be too big-patch-set. To avoid patch-bomb, I will post
> some of them as sample. I will post full-patch-set if there was no
> objection.

Yes, we should do the conversion - I've been chipping away at this
intermittently myself (mainly for CODECs).  If you want to push through
the remainder that'd be awesome!

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature