[RFC] ASoC: use inclusive language for SND_SOC_DAIFMT_CBx_CFx

[Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Mark

ASoC has both

	(A) SND_SOC_DAIFMT_CB{MS}_CF{MS}
	(B) SND_SOC_DAIFMT_CB{PC}_CF{PC}
	                      ^^     ^^
M/S is Master/Slave, P/C is Provider/Consumer.
       ^      ^             ^        ^

We should not use (A) today, use (B) instead, but we still have (A)
definition for backword compatibility.
I think we should full switch to use (B), and remove (A).

But it will be too big-patch-set. To avoid patch-bomb, I will post
some of them as sample. I will post full-patch-set if there was no
objection.

Thank you for your help !!

Best regards
---
Kuninori Morimoto