Re: [PATCH] ASoC: cs35l56: Accept values greater than 0 as IRQ numbers

[Richard Fitzgerald <rf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 18/06/2024 17:00, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 03:54:04PM +0100, Richard Fitzgerald wrote:
>
> > So 0 is invalid. Question is: is it also valid to pass -ve errors, or is
> > 0 the _only_ invalid value?
>
> Negative values should be fine.
In that case this patch is necessary so we reject negative values
as not an IRQ. Otherwise we'll try to request a non-existant IRQ and
fail with an error.