On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 03:54:04PM +0100, Richard Fitzgerald wrote: > So 0 is invalid. Question is: is it also valid to pass -ve errors, or is > 0 the _only_ invalid value? Negative values should be fine.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] ASoC: cs35l56: Accept values greater than 0 as IRQ numbers
- From: Richard Fitzgerald
- Re: [PATCH] ASoC: cs35l56: Accept values greater than 0 as IRQ numbers
- References:
- [PATCH] ASoC: cs35l56: Accept values greater than 0 as IRQ numbers
- From: Simon Trimmer
- Re: [PATCH] ASoC: cs35l56: Accept values greater than 0 as IRQ numbers
- From: Mark Brown
- Re: [PATCH] ASoC: cs35l56: Accept values greater than 0 as IRQ numbers
- From: Richard Fitzgerald
- RE: [PATCH] ASoC: cs35l56: Accept values greater than 0 as IRQ numbers
- From: Simon Trimmer
- Re: [PATCH] ASoC: cs35l56: Accept values greater than 0 as IRQ numbers
- From: Richard Fitzgerald
- [PATCH] ASoC: cs35l56: Accept values greater than 0 as IRQ numbers
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: cs35l56: Accept values greater than 0 as IRQ numbers
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/3] spi: cs42l43: Add speaker id support to the bridge configuration
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: cs35l56: Accept values greater than 0 as IRQ numbers
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: cs35l56: Accept values greater than 0 as IRQ numbers
- Index(es):
 |