Hi Eugeniu > > + /* > > + * SSI8 is not connected to ADG. > > + * Thus SSI9 is using 8 > > + */ > > + if (id == 9) > > + ws = 8; (snip) > Quick/preliminary verification attempts showed that it might not be > fully equivalent to the original patch If it is indicating that above simple code doesn't care about SSI8 error case, I don't think it needs to care about it. Because SSI8 with shared pin setting is *mandatory*. Thank you for your help !! Best regards --- Renesas Electronics Ph.D. Kuninori Morimoto
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] ASoC: rcar: adg: correct TIMSEL setting for SSI9
- From: Eugeniu Rosca
- Re: [PATCH] ASoC: rcar: adg: correct TIMSEL setting for SSI9
- References:
- [PATCH] ASoC: rcar: adg: correct TIMSEL setting for SSI9
- From: Eugeniu Rosca
- Re: [PATCH] ASoC: rcar: adg: correct TIMSEL setting for SSI9
- From: Kuninori Morimoto
- Re: [PATCH] ASoC: rcar: adg: correct TIMSEL setting for SSI9
- From: Eugeniu Rosca
- [PATCH] ASoC: rcar: adg: correct TIMSEL setting for SSI9
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] ASoC: dt-bindings: fsl,imx-asrc: update max interrupt numbers
- Next by Date: [PATCH v18 02/41] usb: host: xhci: Export enable and disable interrupter APIs
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: rcar: adg: correct TIMSEL setting for SSI9
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: rcar: adg: correct TIMSEL setting for SSI9
- Index(es):
![]() |