On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 06:58:53AM +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote:
❦ 25 juillet 2016 06:06 CEST, Martin Kletzander <mkletzan@xxxxxxxxxx> :╭─────┤ http://libvirt.org/formatnetwork.html#elementsConnect ├───── │Inclusion of the forward element indicates that the virtual network is │to be connected to the physical LAN.Since 0.3.0. The mode attribute │determines the method of forwarding. If there is no forward element, the │network will be isolated from any other network (unless a guest │connected to that network is acting as a router, of course). ╰───── That's exactly what I want: just a vnet interface, no bridge, no routing, no forwarding. However, if I create a network with just that:"Just a vnet interface, no bridge" means you want no network. Where should the vnet be connected?The host is able to handle the routing. It seems I could just declare an interface of type "ethernet" instead of "network" to get the effect I want.
I'm sorry, but I have no idea what is the end result you are trying to achieve. Could you describe what are your trying to set up without libvirt technicalities?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ libvirt-users mailing list libvirt-users@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-users
