Re: Network without forward mode

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



 ❦ 25 juillet 2016 08:44 CEST, Martin Kletzander <mkletzan@xxxxxxxxxx> :

>>> "Just a vnet interface, no bridge" means you want no network.  Where
>>> should the vnet be connected?
>>
>>The host is able to handle the routing. It seems I could just declare an
>>interface of type "ethernet" instead of "network" to get the effect I
>>want.
>
> I'm sorry, but I have no idea what is the end result you are trying to
> achieve.  Could you describe what are your trying to set up without
> libvirt technicalities?

I have a process watching libvirt event to add a route like "ip route
add 192.0.2.147/32 dev vnet18" once the VM is spawned. The host is then
responsible for any routing to/from the VM. I don't want the VM to be
part of a bridge.
-- 
Indent to show the logical structure of a program.
            - The Elements of Programming Style (Kernighan & Plauger)

_______________________________________________
libvirt-users mailing list
libvirt-users@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-users




[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux