On 19.08.2013 11:06, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 10:29:10AM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote: >> On 09.08.2013 18:29, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: >>> On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 10:58:55AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote: >>>> Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: >>>> >>>>> [CC'ing qemu-devel list] >>>>> On 09.08.2013 15:17, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: >>>>>> On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 07:13:58AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote: >>>>>>> On 08/09/2013 06:56 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote: >> >> >> So what's the conclusion? Should I push the patch until qemu gets >> stabilized in mem consumption (which can take a while - no offense to >> qemu devels, I can imagine it's nontrivial). > > Given the lack of any useful info to make memory limits work reliably, > I guess we don't have any choice but to remove this default memory limit, > and also recommend against people setting explicit memory limits too. > > Regards, > Daniel > Okay, I've pushed the patch. And I've just proposed patch to discourage users setting this limit: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2013-August/msg00820.html Michal -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list