On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 10:29:10AM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote: > On 09.08.2013 18:29, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 10:58:55AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote: > >> Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> > >>> [CC'ing qemu-devel list] > >>> On 09.08.2013 15:17, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > >>>> On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 07:13:58AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote: > >>>>> On 08/09/2013 06:56 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote: > > > So what's the conclusion? Should I push the patch until qemu gets > stabilized in mem consumption (which can take a while - no offense to > qemu devels, I can imagine it's nontrivial). Given the lack of any useful info to make memory limits work reliably, I guess we don't have any choice but to remove this default memory limit, and also recommend against people setting explicit memory limits too. Regards, Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :| -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list