On 30.10.2012 08:28, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: > 29.10.2012 17:31, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: >> On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 09:08:41AM +0000, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: >>> This is a follow-up to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=861309 >>> >>> If one has USB disks configured for domain with explicit <address/>, libvirtd >>> ignores that node when building qemu command line. So, disk is connected to >>> the first free USB port implicitly by qemu. >>> That breaks other USB devices which have explicit <address/> - ports they >>> should be connected to may be already occupied by disks. >>> >>> With first patch applied, if one has USB disk connected to the USB hub, qemu >>> fails to start, because it does not know anything about hubs yet (when parsing disks). >>> That's why second patch is needed. >>> >>> Vladislav Bogdanov (2): >>> qemu: Do not ignore address for USB disks >>> qemu: pass -usb and usb hubs earlier, so USB disks with static >>> address are handled properly >> >> ACK to both > > Could they be committed before 1.1.0? > I do not have rights. > > Vladislav Pushed now. Michal -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list