29.10.2012 17:31, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 09:08:41AM +0000, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: >> This is a follow-up to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=861309 >> >> If one has USB disks configured for domain with explicit <address/>, libvirtd >> ignores that node when building qemu command line. So, disk is connected to >> the first free USB port implicitly by qemu. >> That breaks other USB devices which have explicit <address/> - ports they >> should be connected to may be already occupied by disks. >> >> With first patch applied, if one has USB disk connected to the USB hub, qemu >> fails to start, because it does not know anything about hubs yet (when parsing disks). >> That's why second patch is needed. >> >> Vladislav Bogdanov (2): >> qemu: Do not ignore address for USB disks >> qemu: pass -usb and usb hubs earlier, so USB disks with static >> address are handled properly > > ACK to both Could they be committed before 1.1.0? I do not have rights. Vladislav -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list