On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 09:08:41AM +0000, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: > This is a follow-up to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=861309 > > If one has USB disks configured for domain with explicit <address/>, libvirtd > ignores that node when building qemu command line. So, disk is connected to > the first free USB port implicitly by qemu. > That breaks other USB devices which have explicit <address/> - ports they > should be connected to may be already occupied by disks. > > With first patch applied, if one has USB disk connected to the USB hub, qemu > fails to start, because it does not know anything about hubs yet (when parsing disks). > That's why second patch is needed. > > Vladislav Bogdanov (2): > qemu: Do not ignore address for USB disks > qemu: pass -usb and usb hubs earlier, so USB disks with static > address are handled properly ACK to both Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :| -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list