Re: [PATCH 1/7] qemu: Fix misleading comment for qemuDomainObjBeginJobWithDriver()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/11/12 05:25, Eric Blake wrote:
On 10/09/2012 07:39 AM, Peter Krempa wrote:
The comment stated that you may call qemuDomainObjBeginJobWithDriver()
without passing qemud_driver to signalize it's not locked.

signalize is a valid spelling, but unusual; I'd write it 'signal'.

qemuDomainObjBeginJobWithDriver still accesses the qemud_driver
structure and the lock singalling is done through a separate parameter.

s/singalling/signaling/

---
  src/qemu/qemu_domain.c | 3 +--
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)


ACK.  This one can be applied independently of my pending patches
(aargh, I still need to get those rebased with comments addressed...).

I fixed the spelling and pushed.

Peter

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list


[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]