On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 03:35:27PM +0200, Jiri Denemark wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 16:35:05 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 02:13:24PM +0200, Jiri Denemark wrote:
> > > diff --git a/src/conf/domain_conf.h b/src/conf/domain_conf.h
> > > index fa5d1f4..3cb1193 100644
> > > --- a/src/conf/domain_conf.h
> > > +++ b/src/conf/domain_conf.h
> > > @@ -386,6 +386,7 @@ struct _virDomainHostdevDef {
> > > int mode; /* enum virDomainHostdevMode */
> > > int startupPolicy; /* enum virDomainStartupPolicy */
> > > unsigned int managed : 1;
> > > + unsigned int missing : 1;
> > > union {
> > > virDomainHostdevSubsys subsys;
> > > struct {
> >
> > I was wondering if we should actually expose this in the
> > XML, as a read-only attribute, only shown when requesting
> > the live XML. Otherwise there's no way for an application
> > to determine whether the USB device they requested was
> > actually given to the guest, without looking inside the
> > guest.
>
> Yeah, this sounds like a useful thing. Could that be a follow up patch to
> avoid holding up the whole series just for this? :-)
As long as we do the followup now, I'm fine with it being separate.
Just don't want us to release anything without it.
Daniel
--
|: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list