On 03/26/2012 04:08 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
If I see something like -nodefconfig, I assume it will create a bare
bones guest that will not depend on any qemu defaults and will be stable
across releases.
That's not even close to what -nodefconfig is. That's pretty much
what -nodefaults is but -nodefaults has also had a fluid definition
historically.
Okay. Let's just make sure to document -nodefconfig as version specific
and -nodefaults as the stable way to create a bare bones guest (and
define exactly what that means).
Agreed. But I do want to point out, that -nodefaults has not been stable and
since it doesn't universally create a bare bones guest, it's not clear that it
will be.
I think what we want to move toward is a -no-machine option which allows a user
to explicitly build a machine from scratch. That is:
qemu -no-machine -device i440fx,id=host -device isa-serial,chr=chr0 ...
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list