So, trying to summarize what was discussed in the call: On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 10:08:10AM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote: > > Let's say we moved CPU definitions to /usr/share/qemu/cpu-models.xml. > > > > Obviously, we'd want a command line option to be able to change that > > location so we'd introduce -cpu-models PATH. > > > > But we want all of our command line options to be settable by the > > global configuration file so we would have a cpu-model=PATH to the > > configuration file. > > > > But why hard code a path when we can just set the default path in the > > configuration file so let's avoid hard coding and just put > > cpu-models=/usr/share/qemu/cpu-models.xml in the default > > configuration file. > > We wouldn't do the above. > > -nodefconfig should disable the loading of files on /etc, but it > shouldn't disable loading internal non-configurable data that we just > happened to choose to store outside the qemu binary because it makes > development easier. The statement above is the one not fulfilled by the compromise solution: -nodefconfig would really disable the loading of files on /usr/share. > > Really, the requirement of a "default configuration file" is a problem > by itself. Qemu should not require a default configuration file to work, > and it shouldn't require users to copy the default configuration file to > change options from the default. The statement above is only partly true. The default configuration file would be still needed, but if defaults are stored on /usr/share, I will be happy with it. My main problem was with the need to _copy_ or edit a non-trivial default config file. If the not-often-edited defaults/templates are easily found on /usr/share to be used with -readconfig, I will be happy with this solution, even if -nodefconfig disable the files on /usr/share. > > Doing this would make it impossible to deploy fixes to users if we evern > find out that the default configuration file had a serious bug. What if > a bug in our default configuration file has a serious security > implication? The answer to this is: if the broken templates/defaults are on /usr/share, it would be easy to deploy the fix. So, the compromise solution is: - We can move some configuration data (especially defaults/templates) to /usr/share (machine-types and CPU models could go there). This way we can easily deploy fixes to the defaults, if necessary. - To reuse Qemu models, or machine-types, and not define everything from scratch, libvirt will have to use something like: "-nodefconfig -readconfig /usr/share/qemu/cpu-models-x86.conf" (the item below is not something discussed on the call, just something I want to add) To make this work better, we can allow users (humans or machines) to "extend" CPU models on the config file, instead of having to define everything from scratch. So, on /etc (or on a libvirt-generated config) we could have something like: ============= [cpu] base_cpudef = Nehalem add_features = "vmx" ============= Then, as long as /usr/share/cpu-models-x86.conf is loaded, the user will be able to reuse the Nehalem CPU model provided by Qemu. > > > > > But now when libvirt uses -nodefconfig, those models go away. > > -nodefconfig means start QEMU in the most minimal state possible. > > You get what you pay for if you use it. > > > > We'll have the same problem with machine configuration files. At > > some point in time, -nodefconfig will make machine models disappear. > > It shouldn't. Machine-types are defaults to be used as base, they are > not user-provided configuration. And the fact that we decided to store > some data outside of the Qemu binary is orthogonal the design decisions > in the Qemu command-line and configuration interface. So, this problem is solved if the defaults are easily found on /usr/share. We still have the backwards compatibility problem for pc-1.0, pc-1.1, and so on. But that can be discussed later, when we actually move machine-types to somewhere outside .c files. > > As I said previously, requiring generation of opaque config files (and > "copy the default config file and change it" is included on my > definition of "generation of opaque config files") is poor design, IMO. > I bet this even has an entry in some design anti-pattern catalog > somewhere. This problem is also solved if the defaults are deployed on /usr/share and just reused/included by the config files on /etc. -- Eduardo -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list