On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 03:04:49AM -0800, Andrea Bolognani wrote: > I agree that the current situation is a bit messy, especially with > most images having both an SVG and a PNG variant and with all the > icons included to optimize for various clients. > > For the former we could just move everything to docs/images/, but I'm > not sure if something like docs/icons/ would work for the latter: > back in the Web 1.0 days, clients would look for favicon.ico at the > top-level so you were pretty much forced to place the file there. Are > things any better these days? Could we get away with stashing the > various icons in a sub-directory? CC'ing Dan who introduced them and > might know. I've gone ahead and implemented the ideas mentioned above. https://listman.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2021-December/msg00828.html -- Andrea Bolognani / Red Hat / Virtualization
