On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 10:46:34AM +0100, Peter Krempa wrote: > Well, I'd prefer if the image files don't clutter the main docs > directory, because it's already too many files in there. Since it's > already a mess, I don't really have too much ground to stand on. > > I'll try to de-messify it once it irritates me enough, so go ahead > regardless of the approach you choose. Thanks, I've pushed the patch as is for now. I agree that the current situation is a bit messy, especially with most images having both an SVG and a PNG variant and with all the icons included to optimize for various clients. For the former we could just move everything to docs/images/, but I'm not sure if something like docs/icons/ would work for the latter: back in the Web 1.0 days, clients would look for favicon.ico at the top-level so you were pretty much forced to place the file there. Are things any better these days? Could we get away with stashing the various icons in a sub-directory? CC'ing Dan who introduced them and might know. -- Andrea Bolognani / Red Hat / Virtualization
