On Wed, Jun 06, 2018 at 12:02:12 +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote: > On Wed, 2018-06-06 at 11:14 +1000, David Gibson wrote: > > Personally I think the shift is *more* usable than a raw page size, > > since the latter is inevitably going to involve counting a bunch of > > zeroes to see if it's the number you meant. Allowing forms like "16M" > > / "16G" could be nicer; not sure if we have existing helper functions > > which will make that easy. > > I was indeed thinking about the latter. > > > TBH, if the user is already thinking about page sizes at this low > > level, I don't think doing it by shift is much of a stretch. > > I disagree that it's such a low level setting that only people who > can do bitwise shifts off the top of their heads will want to > tweak: if it were, then libvirt will probably not need to expose > it in the first place :) Well, it will most probably be configured by some policy code from a upper layer mgmt tool, so I don't think users will actually ever touch it.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
