On Wed, 2018-06-06 at 11:14 +1000, David Gibson wrote: > Personally I think the shift is *more* usable than a raw page size, > since the latter is inevitably going to involve counting a bunch of > zeroes to see if it's the number you meant. Allowing forms like "16M" > / "16G" could be nicer; not sure if we have existing helper functions > which will make that easy. I was indeed thinking about the latter. > TBH, if the user is already thinking about page sizes at this low > level, I don't think doing it by shift is much of a stretch. I disagree that it's such a low level setting that only people who can do bitwise shifts off the top of their heads will want to tweak: if it were, then libvirt will probably not need to expose it in the first place :) -- Andrea Bolognani / Red Hat / Virtualization -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
