On Wed, 2016-05-11 at 10:01 -0400, Cole Robinson wrote: > On 05/11/2016 02:04 AM, Nishith Shah wrote: > > > > Hi everyone, sorry about the empty message above, I was typing and I pressed > > the wrong set of keys. > > > > So, I was going through the contributor guidelines page[1], and after > > discussing with Michal Privoznik, I think there are some things that need to > > be updated. For instance, the 4th point about posting patches mentions using > > git diff instead of git format-patch. I also feel that the workflow in general > > should be re-written and updated with some more details. I have written a very > > detailed post about the workflow here[2], and might pick some points up from > > there. Please let me know what you think of it. > > > > Also, please post the other things that you think should be changed on that > > page in this thread. > > I've thought a bit about this too. I don't think the HACKING page is a good > landing page for new contributors. It _is_ useful document _everything_ that a > contributor might want to know, but I think we should also have a page > specifically for a contributor quickstart which has very bare minimum info. We have something like that - it's called README-hacking :) I argued before that HACKING should be our quickstart document, just as is the case with many other projects, and the full contributors guidelines should live in a separate document that bears a different name. -- Andrea Bolognani Software Engineer - Virtualization Team -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list