On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 10:31:34AM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote: > On Thu, 2016-05-12 at 09:58 +0200, Jiri Denemark wrote: > > On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 11:57:36 -0400, Laine Stump wrote: > > > > > > I reverted these three patches that introduced and enabled a "peer" > > > attribute for type='ethernet' interface <ip> elements prior to the > > > release of 1.3.4 with the intent of fixing/re-posting them after > > > release, but forgot until today: > > > > > > https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2016-April/msg01995.html > > > > > > I have patches for most of the bugs, but the one problem that still > > > doesn't have resolution is the naming of the "peer" attribute. In my > > > opinion, having the two address attributes named "address" and "peer" > > > makes it ambiguous which address is for the guest side and which for the > > > host side (especially since the attribute that has been named "peer" > > > would be set to the "address" in the netlink command, and the attribute > > > named "address" would be set to "peer" in the netlink command :-O). > > > > > > Since "address" is an existing attribute, and already used for the guest > > > side IP address in lxc type='bridge' interfaces, it must remain as-is. > > > In order to make it obvious that the new address is for the host side of > > > the tap (or veth pair in the case of lxc), I propose calling it either > > > "host", or "hostAddress", e.g: > > > > > > <ip address='192.168.123.43' host='192.168.123.1' prefix='25'/> > > > > > > or > > > > > > <ip address='192.168.123.4' hostAddress='192.168.123.1' prefix='25'/> > > > > IMO "host" is better. After all it's an attribute of "ip" element so > > it's obvious we're talking about addresses here. > > I like "hostAddress" better myself :) > > Is there any real chance the "prefix" attribute will need to be specified > for the host as well? Because in that case we would clearly have to go > with "hostPrefix", and using "host" instead of "hostAddress" would look > quite ugly. Both IP addresses are required to be in the same subnet and thus have the same prefix Regards, Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :| -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list