Daniel Veillard <veillard@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 05, 2008 at 02:53:19PM +0100, Jim Meyering wrote: >> Without this patch, running make check would trigger this minor leak: >> >> 10 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 1 of 20 >> at 0x4A0739E: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:207) >> by 0x3F872808A1: strdup (strdup.c:43) >> by 0x4CA2503: qemudLoadDriverConfig (qemu_conf.c:70) >> by 0x4CA7EA7: qemudStartup (qemu_driver.c:216) >> by 0x4C3AEBC: __virStateInitialize (libvirt.c:592) >> by 0x4096B6: qemudInitialize (qemud.c:738) >> by 0x40CCCF: main (qemud.c:2216) >> >> Looking into it, I found there were actually two separate leaks >> and an erroneous diagnostic. This fixes them: > > The patch looks fine to me, Thanks. I've committed it. -- Libvir-list mailing list Libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list