On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 11:16 AM, Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 04:15:57PM +0100, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote: >> Having said that, I don't think this is so much better than the the >> solution we already merged that it'd be worth delaying releases for >> (which were due day before yesterday). > > For what it's worth, libosinfo is not following GNOME release cycle. > The fact that GNOME Boxes maintainers decided to depend on libosinfo.git > is in a way Boxes problem. I'm one of the maintainers and libosinfo follows GNOME release cycle if it needs to, as long as Daniel is fine with it. FWIW, I've talked to Daniel about release at least two weeks before and I also asked him two days ago. > Rushing some last minute patches in, and insisting that the patches have > to go in before a release is pushing things a bit too far in my opinion. If you over-exaggerate the situation, of course it looks "too far" to you. They weren't exactly last minute. I worked at late night to ensure that I give you at least a whole day to review them, pinged you to review them when I didn't receive any input from anyone during the day and acted on your review comments that I could and only merged them after realizing that your remaining comment could be addressed after the release without breaking API. -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) ________________________________________ Befriend GNOME: http://www.gnome.org/friends/ _______________________________________________ Libosinfo mailing list Libosinfo@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo
