On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 04:15:57PM +0100, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote: > Having said that, I don't think this is so much better than the the > solution we already merged that it'd be worth delaying releases for > (which were due day before yesterday). For what it's worth, libosinfo is not following GNOME release cycle. The fact that GNOME Boxes maintainers decided to depend on libosinfo.git is in a way Boxes problem. Making a libosinfo release to accommodate Boxes makes sense, though it I'd prefer if this was anticipated and we started preparing for a libosinfo release the week before for example. Rushing some last minute patches in, and insisting that the patches have to go in before a release is pushing things a bit too far in my opinion. Christophe
Attachment:
pgpF3xYuynh4q.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Libosinfo mailing list Libosinfo@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo
