On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 3:38 PM, Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 12:35:48AM +0100, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote: >> This time around, we also recommend RAM and storage to some nice sane >> values. >> >> Test data for each media is included. >> --- >> data/oses/fedora.xml.in | 174 ++++++++++++++++++++- >> .../Fedora-Live-Workstation-i686-22-3.iso.txt | 29 ++++ >> .../Fedora-Live-Workstation-x86_64-22-3.iso.txt | 29 ++++ >> .../fedora22/Fedora-Server-DVD-i386-22.iso.txt | 29 ++++ >> .../fedora22/Fedora-Server-DVD-x86_64-22.iso.txt | 29 ++++ >> .../fedora22/Fedora-Server-netinst-i386-22.iso.txt | 29 ++++ >> .../Fedora-Server-netinst-x86_64-22.iso.txt | 29 ++++ >> .../Fedora-Workstation-netinst-i386-22.iso.txt | 29 ++++ >> .../Fedora-Workstation-netinst-x86_64-22.iso.txt | 29 ++++ >> 9 files changed, 404 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> create mode 100644 test/isodata/fedora/fedora22/Fedora-Live-Workstation-i686-22-3.iso.txt >> create mode 100644 test/isodata/fedora/fedora22/Fedora-Live-Workstation-x86_64-22-3.iso.txt >> create mode 100644 test/isodata/fedora/fedora22/Fedora-Server-DVD-i386-22.iso.txt >> create mode 100644 test/isodata/fedora/fedora22/Fedora-Server-DVD-x86_64-22.iso.txt >> create mode 100644 test/isodata/fedora/fedora22/Fedora-Server-netinst-i386-22.iso.txt >> create mode 100644 test/isodata/fedora/fedora22/Fedora-Server-netinst-x86_64-22.iso.txt >> create mode 100644 test/isodata/fedora/fedora22/Fedora-Workstation-netinst-i386-22.iso.txt >> create mode 100644 test/isodata/fedora/fedora22/Fedora-Workstation-netinst-x86_64-22.iso.txt >> >> diff --git a/data/oses/fedora.xml.in b/data/oses/fedora.xml.in >> index 2e4b898..2b6e994 100644 >> --- a/data/oses/fedora.xml.in >> +++ b/data/oses/fedora.xml.in >> @@ -4081,6 +4081,171 @@ >> </installer> >> </os> >> >> + <os id="http://fedoraproject.org/fedora/22";> >> + <short-id>fedora22</short-id> >> + <_name>Fedora 22</_name> >> + <version>22</version> >> + <_vendor>Fedora Project</_vendor> >> + <family>linux</family> >> + <distro>fedora</distro> >> + <upgrades id="http://fedoraproject.org/fedora/21"/> >> + <derives-from id="http://fedoraproject.org/fedora/21"/> >> + >> + <release-date>2015-05-26</release-date> >> + >> + <variant id="workstation"> >> + <_name>Fedora 22 Workstation</_name> >> + </variant> >> + <variant id="workstation-netinst"> >> + <_name>Fedora 22</_name> >> + </variant> > > Why not "Fedora 22 Workstation" here? Hmm.. Yeah I guess it makes sense now that there are different netinstaller ISO. >> + <!-- Network Installer !--> >> + <media arch="i686"> >> + <variant id="workstation-netinst"/> > > Looks like this would be much better expressed as > <media arch="i686" installer="true" netinst="true"> > <variant id="workstation"/> > </media> > or something like that. I think you are correct. Wonder why didn't think of that. probably cause I had been thinking in term so associating installer to particular variants. Having said that, I don't think this is so much better than the the solution we already merged that it'd be worth delaying releases for (which were due day before yesterday). We'd want "netinst" param (or "require-internet") param on media anyway though to let apps know this media needs internet to work. -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) ________________________________________ Befriend GNOME: http://www.gnome.org/friends/ _______________________________________________ Libosinfo mailing list Libosinfo@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo
