On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 4:15 PM, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) <zeeshanak@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 3:38 PM, Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 12:35:48AM +0100, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote: >>> This time around, we also recommend RAM and storage to some nice sane >>> values. >>> >>> Test data for each media is included. >>> --- >>> data/oses/fedora.xml.in | 174 ++++++++++++++++++++- >>> .../Fedora-Live-Workstation-i686-22-3.iso.txt | 29 ++++ >>> .../Fedora-Live-Workstation-x86_64-22-3.iso.txt | 29 ++++ >>> .../fedora22/Fedora-Server-DVD-i386-22.iso.txt | 29 ++++ >>> .../fedora22/Fedora-Server-DVD-x86_64-22.iso.txt | 29 ++++ >>> .../fedora22/Fedora-Server-netinst-i386-22.iso.txt | 29 ++++ >>> .../Fedora-Server-netinst-x86_64-22.iso.txt | 29 ++++ >>> .../Fedora-Workstation-netinst-i386-22.iso.txt | 29 ++++ >>> .../Fedora-Workstation-netinst-x86_64-22.iso.txt | 29 ++++ >>> 9 files changed, 404 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >>> create mode 100644 test/isodata/fedora/fedora22/Fedora-Live-Workstation-i686-22-3.iso.txt >>> create mode 100644 test/isodata/fedora/fedora22/Fedora-Live-Workstation-x86_64-22-3.iso.txt >>> create mode 100644 test/isodata/fedora/fedora22/Fedora-Server-DVD-i386-22.iso.txt >>> create mode 100644 test/isodata/fedora/fedora22/Fedora-Server-DVD-x86_64-22.iso.txt >>> create mode 100644 test/isodata/fedora/fedora22/Fedora-Server-netinst-i386-22.iso.txt >>> create mode 100644 test/isodata/fedora/fedora22/Fedora-Server-netinst-x86_64-22.iso.txt >>> create mode 100644 test/isodata/fedora/fedora22/Fedora-Workstation-netinst-i386-22.iso.txt >>> create mode 100644 test/isodata/fedora/fedora22/Fedora-Workstation-netinst-x86_64-22.iso.txt >>> >>> diff --git a/data/oses/fedora.xml.in b/data/oses/fedora.xml.in >>> index 2e4b898..2b6e994 100644 >>> --- a/data/oses/fedora.xml.in >>> +++ b/data/oses/fedora.xml.in >>> @@ -4081,6 +4081,171 @@ >>> </installer> >>> </os> >>> >>> + <os id="http://fedoraproject.org/fedora/22";> >>> + <short-id>fedora22</short-id> >>> + <_name>Fedora 22</_name> >>> + <version>22</version> >>> + <_vendor>Fedora Project</_vendor> >>> + <family>linux</family> >>> + <distro>fedora</distro> >>> + <upgrades id="http://fedoraproject.org/fedora/21"/> >>> + <derives-from id="http://fedoraproject.org/fedora/21"/> >>> + >>> + <release-date>2015-05-26</release-date> >>> + >>> + <variant id="workstation"> >>> + <_name>Fedora 22 Workstation</_name> >>> + </variant> >>> + <variant id="workstation-netinst"> >>> + <_name>Fedora 22</_name> >>> + </variant> >> >> Why not "Fedora 22 Workstation" here? > > Hmm.. Yeah I guess it makes sense now that there are different netinstaller ISO. > >>> + <!-- Network Installer !--> >>> + <media arch="i686"> >>> + <variant id="workstation-netinst"/> >> >> Looks like this would be much better expressed as >> <media arch="i686" installer="true" netinst="true"> >> <variant id="workstation"/> >> </media> >> or something like that. > > I think you are correct. Wonder why didn't think of that. probably > cause I had been thinking in term so associating installer to > particular variants. > > Having said that, I don't think this is so much better than the the > solution we already merged that it'd be worth delaying releases for > (which were due day before yesterday). We'd want "netinst" param (or > "require-internet") param on media anyway though to let apps know this > media needs internet to work. Just realized, we won't need to change/modify any API to convert these entries to what you suggested. We'll just need a bit of new API. -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) ________________________________________ Befriend GNOME: http://www.gnome.org/friends/ _______________________________________________ Libosinfo mailing list Libosinfo@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo
