On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 03:20:11PM +0000, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote: > On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 2:45 PM, Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 02:29:54PM +0000, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote: > >> > other applications might want to use that > >> > distinction for other purposes, not only to get a f21 unattended installer. > >> > >> Maybe but I wonder what can they possibly do with that information > >> since all they can see is that the two medias are different. > > > > Knowing that one media is a live image, and another is a netiso > > is more than "the 2 medias are different". > > Yeah, the difference of installer & live is of course significant and > I can see the value of that differentiation to the app but I thought > we were talking the difference of DVD vs netiso. And I thought you were talking about live VS netiso ;) > > > You may want a live iso but > > not a netiso as you want a quick preview of a system, you may want a > > netiso because it's smaller, you may not want a netiso because you know > > installation is likely to be a bit longish, ... > > Yeah but that can only work if apps have a way of knowing its 'network > installer' rather than just another variant. Yes, which was my initial question/point, this commit adds separate medias for netinst, but does not add separate variants for netinst, so I was asking if this is planned. Christophe
Attachment:
pgpGyiKfXtXdd.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Libosinfo mailing list Libosinfo@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo
