On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 01:52:07PM +0000, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote: > On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 10:08 AM, Christophe Fergeau > <cfergeau@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 04:04:58PM +0000, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote: > >> --- > >> data/oses/fedora.xml.in | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ > >> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+) > >> > >> diff --git a/data/oses/fedora.xml.in b/data/oses/fedora.xml.in > >> index d56d024..9eaa691 100644 > >> --- a/data/oses/fedora.xml.in > >> +++ b/data/oses/fedora.xml.in > >> @@ -3947,6 +3947,7 @@ > >> > >> <!-- Server --> > >> > >> + <!-- DVD --> > >> <media arch="i686"> > >> <variant id="server"/> > >> <url>http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/21/Server/i386/iso/Fedora-Server-DVD-i386-21.iso</url> > >> @@ -3970,6 +3971,30 @@ > >> <initrd>isolinux/initrd.img</initrd> > >> </media> > >> > >> + <!-- Network Installer --> > >> + <media arch="i686"> > >> + <variant id="server"/> > >> + <url>http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/21/Server/i386/iso/Fedora-Server-netinst-i386-21.iso</url> > >> + <iso> > >> + <volume-id>Fedora-S.*21.*-i386</volume-id> > >> + <system-id>LINUX</system-id> > >> + <volume-size>505403392</volume-size> > >> + </iso> > >> + <kernel>isolinux/vmlinuz</kernel> > >> + <initrd>isolinux/initrd.img</initrd> > >> + </media> > >> + <media arch="x86_64"> > >> + <variant id="server"/> > >> + <url>http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/21/Server/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Server-netinst-x86_64-21.iso</url> > >> + <iso> > >> + <volume-id>Fedora-S.*-21.*-x86_64</volume-id> > >> + <system-id>LINUX</system-id> > >> + <volume-size>444067840</volume-size> > >> + </iso> > >> + <kernel>isolinux/vmlinuz</kernel> > >> + <initrd>isolinux/initrd.img</initrd> > >> + </media> > >> + > > > > Shouldn't libosinfo users be able to differentiate between netinst/full > > DVD inst? > > No, I don't see any need for that. I do plan to add a new > "server-netiso" (or simply "netiso" since I'm told the ISO is pretty > generic) In my initial email, "libosinfo user" = "application using libosinfo programmatically", I think this is what you are answering to here. > but I'm planning to keep the (user-visible) name to be the > same as that of "server" since its not exactly a variant but rather we > want to treat it as such to work around this issue of Fedora netiso > express installation and F21 not providing an installer DVD for > Workstation. You want to do that, other applications might want to use that distinction for other purposes, not only to get a f21 unattended installer. Christophe
Attachment:
pgpLgvGwZupar.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Libosinfo mailing list Libosinfo@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo
