On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 2:18 PM, Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 01:52:07PM +0000, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 10:08 AM, Christophe Fergeau >> <cfergeau@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 04:04:58PM +0000, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote: >> >> --- >> >> data/oses/fedora.xml.in | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> >> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+) >> >> >> >> diff --git a/data/oses/fedora.xml.in b/data/oses/fedora.xml.in >> >> index d56d024..9eaa691 100644 >> >> --- a/data/oses/fedora.xml.in >> >> +++ b/data/oses/fedora.xml.in >> >> @@ -3947,6 +3947,7 @@ >> >> >> >> <!-- Server --> >> >> >> >> + <!-- DVD --> >> >> <media arch="i686"> >> >> <variant id="server"/> >> >> <url>http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/21/Server/i386/iso/Fedora-Server-DVD-i386-21.iso</url> >> >> @@ -3970,6 +3971,30 @@ >> >> <initrd>isolinux/initrd.img</initrd> >> >> </media> >> >> >> >> + <!-- Network Installer --> >> >> + <media arch="i686"> >> >> + <variant id="server"/> >> >> + <url>http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/21/Server/i386/iso/Fedora-Server-netinst-i386-21.iso</url> >> >> + <iso> >> >> + <volume-id>Fedora-S.*21.*-i386</volume-id> >> >> + <system-id>LINUX</system-id> >> >> + <volume-size>505403392</volume-size> >> >> + </iso> >> >> + <kernel>isolinux/vmlinuz</kernel> >> >> + <initrd>isolinux/initrd.img</initrd> >> >> + </media> >> >> + <media arch="x86_64"> >> >> + <variant id="server"/> >> >> + <url>http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/21/Server/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Server-netinst-x86_64-21.iso</url> >> >> + <iso> >> >> + <volume-id>Fedora-S.*-21.*-x86_64</volume-id> >> >> + <system-id>LINUX</system-id> >> >> + <volume-size>444067840</volume-size> >> >> + </iso> >> >> + <kernel>isolinux/vmlinuz</kernel> >> >> + <initrd>isolinux/initrd.img</initrd> >> >> + </media> >> >> + >> > >> > Shouldn't libosinfo users be able to differentiate between netinst/full >> > DVD inst? >> >> No, I don't see any need for that. I do plan to add a new >> "server-netiso" (or simply "netiso" since I'm told the ISO is pretty >> generic) > > In my initial email, "libosinfo user" = "application using libosinfo > programmatically", I think this is what you are answering to here. > > >> but I'm planning to keep the (user-visible) name to be the >> same as that of "server" since its not exactly a variant but rather we >> want to treat it as such to work around this issue of Fedora netiso >> express installation and F21 not providing an installer DVD for >> Workstation. > > > You want to do that, Just to be clear, you mean you agree I should go with my plan above? > other applications might want to use that > distinction for other purposes, not only to get a f21 unattended installer. Maybe but I wonder what can they possibly do with that information since all they can see is that the two medias are different. -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) ________________________________________ Befriend GNOME: http://www.gnome.org/friends/ _______________________________________________ Libosinfo mailing list Libosinfo@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo
