On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 2:47 PM, Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 02:02:23PM +0000, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote: >> > Do we want a 'catch-all' entry without specifying a size? >> > Or provide a way to do 'fuzzy' identification where the size would be >> > ignored for ISO detection? "This looks like a Fedora 19 ISO" when the >> > byte size is off by one is much better than "I don't know what ISO this >> > is". >> >> My thinking was that we don't really need to care about those ISOs now >> that they have been long obsoleted. As you can probably see through >> the changes, it took me quite a while to make these changes so I was >> obviously being lazy to go that extra mile to keep supporting those >> ISOs. >> >> Anyway, do we really want to keep supporting those ISOs? > > I don't think we should put a lot of effort into supporting them. > However, if someone has one lying on its hard-drive, knowing that the > ISO he has looks like some kind of unknown or obsolete Fedora ISO would > imo be much more helpful than pretending we don't know anything about > that ISO. I agree but my question was more like do we really need to care of that corner case? With all these changes, we already have A LOT of media entries and I'd rather not complicate the XML file even further for this case. -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) ________________________________________ Befriend GNOME: http://www.gnome.org/friends/ _______________________________________________ Libosinfo mailing list Libosinfo@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo
