On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 9:18 PM, Giuseppe Scrivano <gscrivan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 11:03:50AM +0200, Giuseppe Scrivano wrote: >>> Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: >>> >>> >> diff --git a/data/schemas/libosinfo.rng b/data/schemas/libosinfo.rng >>> >> index 735ced0..9841bce 100644 >>> >> --- a/data/schemas/libosinfo.rng >>> >> +++ b/data/schemas/libosinfo.rng >>> >> @@ -212,6 +212,11 @@ >>> >> </attribute> >>> >> </element> >>> >> </optional> >>> >> + <optional> >>> >> + <element name="is-snapshot"> >>> >> + <ref name='bool'/> >>> >> + </element> >>> >> + </optional> >>> > >>> > Regarding this bit, see >>> > https://www.redhat.com/archives/libosinfo/2013-October/msg00014.html >>> >>> since someone is already working on it (I've added that patch just to >>> get "make check" work again), what do you think about addressing this >>> issue once "is-snapshot" is supported by libosinfo and use v2 for now? >> >> This would be fine with me, but is Daniel's call. +1 from my side as well. > Daniel, would you be fine with it? I don't think we need to block on Daniel anymore about this for so long. -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) FSF member#5124 _______________________________________________ Libosinfo mailing list Libosinfo@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo
