Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 11:03:50AM +0200, Giuseppe Scrivano wrote: >> Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >> >> diff --git a/data/schemas/libosinfo.rng b/data/schemas/libosinfo.rng >> >> index 735ced0..9841bce 100644 >> >> --- a/data/schemas/libosinfo.rng >> >> +++ b/data/schemas/libosinfo.rng >> >> @@ -212,6 +212,11 @@ >> >> </attribute> >> >> </element> >> >> </optional> >> >> + <optional> >> >> + <element name="is-snapshot"> >> >> + <ref name='bool'/> >> >> + </element> >> >> + </optional> >> > >> > Regarding this bit, see >> > https://www.redhat.com/archives/libosinfo/2013-October/msg00014.html >> >> since someone is already working on it (I've added that patch just to >> get "make check" work again), what do you think about addressing this >> issue once "is-snapshot" is supported by libosinfo and use v2 for now? > > This would be fine with me, but is Daniel's call. Daniel, would you be fine with it? Regards, Giuseppe _______________________________________________ Libosinfo mailing list Libosinfo@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo
