On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 11:03:50AM +0200, Giuseppe Scrivano wrote: > Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > >> diff --git a/data/schemas/libosinfo.rng b/data/schemas/libosinfo.rng > >> index 735ced0..9841bce 100644 > >> --- a/data/schemas/libosinfo.rng > >> +++ b/data/schemas/libosinfo.rng > >> @@ -212,6 +212,11 @@ > >> </attribute> > >> </element> > >> </optional> > >> + <optional> > >> + <element name="is-snapshot"> > >> + <ref name='bool'/> > >> + </element> > >> + </optional> > > > > Regarding this bit, see > > https://www.redhat.com/archives/libosinfo/2013-October/msg00014.html > > since someone is already working on it (I've added that patch just to > get "make check" work again), what do you think about addressing this > issue once "is-snapshot" is supported by libosinfo and use v2 for now? This would be fine with me, but is Daniel's call. Christophe
Attachment:
pgpcENMc8lU7T.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Libosinfo mailing list Libosinfo@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo
