On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 03:00:35PM +0200, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote: > On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 12:59 PM, Christophe Fergeau > <cfergeau@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 07:15:00PM +0200, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote: > >> From: "Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)" <zeeshanak@xxxxxxxxx> > >> > >> RHEL 6.3 derives from 6.2, not 6.3 itself. > >> --- > >> data/oses/rhel.xml.in | 4 ++-- > >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/data/oses/rhel.xml.in b/data/oses/rhel.xml.in > >> index 8a4f8de..12d4a02 100644 > >> --- a/data/oses/rhel.xml.in > >> +++ b/data/oses/rhel.xml.in > >> @@ -757,8 +757,8 @@ > >> <family>linux</family> > >> <distro>rhel</distro> > >> <codename>Santiago</codename> > >> - <upgrades id="http://redhat.com/rhel/6.3"/> > >> - <derives-from id="http://redhat.com/rhel/6.3"/> > >> + <upgrades id="http://redhat.com/rhel/6.2"/> > >> + <derives-from id="http://redhat.com/rhel/6.2"/> > > > > Is this something we could add a test for in the test suite so that we > > don't introduce similar bugs in the future? > > Since the DB could also come from outside, I think more useful would > to add warning/assert in loader. If this can be caught from there, works for me. Christophe
Attachment:
pgpI5kmUL3lxs.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Libosinfo mailing list Libosinfo@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo
