On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 12:59 PM, Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 07:15:00PM +0200, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote: >> From: "Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)" <zeeshanak@xxxxxxxxx> >> >> RHEL 6.3 derives from 6.2, not 6.3 itself. >> --- >> data/oses/rhel.xml.in | 4 ++-- >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/data/oses/rhel.xml.in b/data/oses/rhel.xml.in >> index 8a4f8de..12d4a02 100644 >> --- a/data/oses/rhel.xml.in >> +++ b/data/oses/rhel.xml.in >> @@ -757,8 +757,8 @@ >> <family>linux</family> >> <distro>rhel</distro> >> <codename>Santiago</codename> >> - <upgrades id="http://redhat.com/rhel/6.3"/> >> - <derives-from id="http://redhat.com/rhel/6.3"/> >> + <upgrades id="http://redhat.com/rhel/6.2"/> >> + <derives-from id="http://redhat.com/rhel/6.2"/> > > Is this something we could add a test for in the test suite so that we > don't introduce similar bugs in the future? Since the DB could also come from outside, I think more useful would to add warning/assert in loader. -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) FSF member#5124 _______________________________________________ Libosinfo mailing list Libosinfo@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo
