On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 07:15:00PM +0200, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote: > From: "Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)" <zeeshanak@xxxxxxxxx> > > RHEL 6.3 derives from 6.2, not 6.3 itself. > --- > data/oses/rhel.xml.in | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/data/oses/rhel.xml.in b/data/oses/rhel.xml.in > index 8a4f8de..12d4a02 100644 > --- a/data/oses/rhel.xml.in > +++ b/data/oses/rhel.xml.in > @@ -757,8 +757,8 @@ > <family>linux</family> > <distro>rhel</distro> > <codename>Santiago</codename> > - <upgrades id="http://redhat.com/rhel/6.3"/> > - <derives-from id="http://redhat.com/rhel/6.3"/> > + <upgrades id="http://redhat.com/rhel/6.2"/> > + <derives-from id="http://redhat.com/rhel/6.2"/> Is this something we could add a test for in the test suite so that we don't introduce similar bugs in the future? Christophe
Attachment:
pgpkxd2C5SNcS.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Libosinfo mailing list Libosinfo@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo
