Re: solution: custom bootnet.img with additional net drivers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Well, i havent tried yet to build own modules. If you try to, you
must also have the apropriet/same kernel (vmlinuz) on the bootdisk if you
take a another kernel. If you dont you get these version problems like you
wrote.
I think the best way is to get+unpack drvnet.img and maybe drvblock.img
as described in my howto. you can do this also on any other linux
distributions you maybe prefer(debian, gentoo, ...). if the module isnt on
any of these images get kernel-BOOT-2.?.??-?.i386.rpm .. install it .. and
you will find in /lib/modules/2.?.??-?BOOT/kernel/drivers your module.
this should work also work on any linux distribution that uses rpm as
package format (mandrake, suse, ...).
Since i dont know (havent checked yet) whats further in that kernel-BOOT
package, i cant give you any further tips. Maybe it unpacks also in
/usr/src/linux-2.?.??-?BOOT where you can build your own kernel as you
want. But well as i told .. i dont know it and i am to lazy to look now
for it ;>

OJ


> Thanks for the writeup, it was informative.
>
> I have a (related) question: what is the best way to build modules for
> a boot kernel when you DON'T have access to a machine running the same?
> The module(s) that I've tried building invariably fail to load with version
> conflicts. And the kernel that I built (to go with the module, in case that
> works) failed to autodetect some hardware. :-(
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ajay
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Kickstart-list mailing list
> Kickstart-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/kickstart-list
>





[Index of Archives]     [Red Hat General]     [CentOS Users]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux