Hi Seth, Just tried it, seems to work very well without needing to be a static method. Sorry for the misleading patch, I only corrected the syntax when I saw the commit comming without looking any further if this was really needed. Have a nice day, Nicolas Di Pietro -----Original Message----- From: Seth Vidal [mailto:skvidal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 4:32 PM To: External DI PIETRO Nicolas (CAMPUS) Cc: func-list@xxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: func/minion On Mon, 26 Apr 2010, External DI PIETRO Nicolas (CAMPUS) wrote: > > Hi Seth (and ML), > > If you commit this, I think you will break again the minion for python > 2.3, alas, the python 2.3 does not support syntax for decorators, so, > no "@" are allowed. > > Here are two patches related to the fskcing python2.3 compatibility : > Copyfile : rewrite without decorator > Client (overloard part) : something I already told on ML, subprocess > is not available on 2.3, so, we have to use the module given with func > (but, it's someting for the overlord part, and the subprocess module > is in the client part). Tell me if this is bad, because no body > reacted the first time. (And maybe you think it's a bad thing, but, I > don't know) > > Thank for the job ! > Do me a favor. comment out the @staticmethod and tell me if things still work, at all, on python 2.3.X thanks -sv _______________________________________________ Func-list mailing list Func-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/func-list